India became signatory to the Convention of 15 November 1965 on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, also called the Hague Service Convention, on November 23, 2006, and its provisions entered into force on August 1, 2007.
US attorneys seeking service in India would be wise to familiarize themselves with the mandatory character of the Convention as set forth in Volkswagenwerk A.G. v. Schlunk, 486 U.S. 694 (1988).
Canadian attorneys should consult provincial precedent — Canadian courts take a more nuanced view of the Convention, but effectively reach the same conclusion: its limitations must be observed. Regardless of forum court requirements, the service rules of the receiving country must be observed, or enforcement of a judgment may become impossible.
Only Article 5 channels are available to US litigants serving process in India. As such, requests must be directed to the Indian Central Authority, which functions extremely slowly. The Central Authority is usually quite backlogged, and Hague requests might not be processed for months. Accordingly, US litigants should expect at least a six- to nine-month delay (and occasionally more than a full year) for service of process through the standard Central Authority procedure.
To expedite service, Legal Language Services maintains a network of Indian attorneys who are adept at facilitating Hague service of process within the Article 5 framework more quickly than if litigants rely solely on the Central Authority. This procedure is more costly, but time-saving.
India has the distinction of being the most linguistically diverse country in the world. Its residents speak more than 150 languages. As a former British colony, India includes English as an official language, along with 14 other languages.
Documents from the US need not be translated to effect valid service under Indian law, although proof of service from the Central Authority is usually returned in Hindi (and often handwritten). To be accepted in US courts, the proof must itself be translated.
Note that in all cases documents to be served must reasonably be understood by the defendant in order to fulfill US Due Process requirements. Even though India may not require translation into Hindi, Urdu, or any of its other official languages, the forum court may if the defendant does not speak English.
The Central Authority for India is:The Ministry of Law and Justice Department of Legal Affairs
India objects to all forms of alternative service under Article 10. As such, service may only be effected under the Central Authority channel outlined in Article 5.
LLS can assist you with service and can help you understand and meet the requirements for service of process in India. Please call 1-800-755-5775 for more information.
The information provided on this site is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. The information is believed to be accurate at the time of posting; however, LLS is not responsible for any information which may have become outdated or inaccurate.
We welcome feedback and suggestions regarding the content contained on this page. Send your comments to firstname.lastname@example.org.